UK led jurisprudence. There is a a condition that came out of a very, very, very famous case that said that if you engage in an activity that in its necessary essence has to be dangerous and is likely to create damage, then if you engage in that activity, you are liable for anything that happens. Mhmm. It was a very, very, very, very, very, you know, 1st year law school everybody hears about this case. In the United States, there’s an equivalent case that actually builds on the background of that called, Langham v Volicopters. And that’s a case where exactly the same argument was made here in the US. So the court precedent is that if you engage in an ultra hazardous activity and a harm is created, you have a strict liability for all of the consequences of that harm. So the first theory is to pursue strict liability on behalf of the state, to sue the federal government to get all of the funds associated with COVID, Most people don’t understand the nuance of antitrust, but there’s 1 feature of antitrust that’s actually really significant problem. That is the modification of the Sherman article, the old antitrust law with the 9 early 19 hundreds Clayton Act. There is a very specific clause inside the Clayton Act, which makes a felony, what’s called interlocking directors. That means when the directors of what should be competing or corporate interests actually get together and collude to do anything, commercially or otherwise. It turns out that on the September 18, 2019 Global Preparedness Monitoring Board sat Jeremy Farr of the Welcome Trust, doctor Chris Elias of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Foundation, Anthony Fauci’s NIAID, the Chinese doctor Gao from the CDC, and several other interlocking directorates. These are commercial or market competitors who actually sat on the common board. That is a felony violation of the Clayton Act. And because of that 1 thing, we have the ability to actually go after the entirety of the COVID conspiracy since 2005. Yeah. The reason why that’s important is because we have to get everything predating December of 2019. All the crimes in that case have to predate 2019. Because once you get into the Prep Act, EUA, all that kind of stuff, there’s all kinds of immunity shields that they can hide behind. But if everything that we prosecute happens prior to 2019, then we have a case that actually allows us to take antitrust and then go forward in discovery, discover all the crimes. We already know what the crimes are, but we get to discover all those crimes in that prosecution, which then gets us to the second felony action for all the felonies that actually are not shielded under the PREP Act. Because under the PREP Act, there is only 1 silver bullet that is available anywhere, which is if a fraud was perpetrated to create the emergency. Right. The only silver bullet anywhere in the Prep Act, that blows up the immunity shield for all the manufacturers, and you get to go after Pfizer and Moderna and the whole lot of them. Wow. So what what we’re doing is a staircase. Mhmm. We’re doing the first action that will give us discovery to the second action. The second action gives us discovery to the 3rd action. Alright. When I tell people that this is a complicated process, it ain’t complicated. It’s freaking playing chess in 3 dimensions underwater standing on your head, getting COVID done. Like, it’s a not easy proposition. Wow.